Activists say feds conducting sham nuke review
by Michael R Blood, Associated Press
October 09, 2012 03:20 PM | 2528 views | 1 1 comments | 3 3 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Nuclear Regulatory Commission administrator Elmo Collins addresses the media and takes questions during a news conference at the Residence Inn Hotel in San Juan Capistrano, Calif., Monday, Oct. 8, 2012. The news conference was held to discuss the proposed restart of one of San Onofre's nuclear reactors. Reactors at the plant were shut down as a safety precaution when steam-generator tubes began to vibrate in unanticipated ways earlier this year. (AP Photo/The Orange County Register, Joshua Sudock)
Nuclear Regulatory Commission administrator Elmo Collins addresses the media and takes questions during a news conference at the Residence Inn Hotel in San Juan Capistrano, Calif., Monday, Oct. 8, 2012. The news conference was held to discuss the proposed restart of one of San Onofre's nuclear reactors. Reactors at the plant were shut down as a safety precaution when steam-generator tubes began to vibrate in unanticipated ways earlier this year. (AP Photo/The Orange County Register, Joshua Sudock)
slideshow
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Environmentalists accused federal regulators Tuesday of conducting a bogus review of a proposal to restart the damaged San Onofre nuclear power plant on the California coast.

Just days after Southern California Edison asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for permission to repair and start the Unit 2 reactor, then run it at reduced power, the agency is facing pressure from groups critical of the nuclear power industry to initiate a review that could take months or even years to complete.

The NRC is "denying the public any meaningful voice" in the review to restart the plant, which has been shuttered since January, Friends of the Earth, the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Committee to Bridge the Gap said in a joint statement.

The NRC has promised a transparent, thorough review of the proposal, which focuses on how the utility will fix faulty steam generators installed during a $670 million overhaul.

"We don’t experiment with safety," NRC Regional Administrator Elmo Collins told reporters Monday.

The environmental groups are pushing the federal agency to require Edison to seek an amendment to its operating license to restart the plant, a process that could take up to two years.

In a March letter, federal regulators outlined a series of benchmarks Edison must reach to restart the plant, includ-ing determining the cause of vibration and friction that damaged scores of steam generator tubes, how it would be fixed and then monitored during operation.

Those requirements, however, did not involve amending the plant’s operating license.

"This significant change rises to the level of a license amendment proceeding in which, by law, the public is enti-tled to participate," the groups said.

Collins said Monday it’s an "open question" if the agency will require a license amendment.

Anti-nuclear activists have argued for months that restarting the plant, located between San Diego and Los Ange-les, would invite catastrophe. About 7.4 million Californians live within 50 miles of San Onofre’s twin domes.

Tests found some tubes were so badly corroded that they could fail and possibly release radiation, a stunning find-ing inside the nearly new equipment.

Edison’s proposal calls for operating Unit 2 at up to 70 percent power for five months then shutting it down for inspections.

The future of the heavily damaged Unit 3 reactor is not clear.

Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Bob in Philly
|
October 13, 2012
Yet again we see the nuclear industry causing problems it cannot solve with a technology to difficult to properly control while dumping the risks and costs on local ratepayers and U.S. taxpayers. All while closing ranks and continuing to act in secret by dismissing with disdain anyone who questions what they are doing.

*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides