Across town, the nonpartisan government watchdog group, Common Cause had its own event. A press briefing that delivered irrefutable evidence the city’s new terminal was and is completely unnecessary and a colossal monument to Atlanta’s “pay to play” politics.
Last week, I wrote about the fact the city maintains it has no idea how many international passengers use the original international terminal (Concourse E) per hour. That’s important why? Because when Concourse E opened in 1994, the federal government boasted that the gigantic concourse could process between 6,000 and 8,000 passengers per hour. Nearly 20 years later, all available evidence shows Concourse E has never exceeded 50 percent capacity, and routinely hovers around 25 percent capacity on any given day.
Former Airport Ground Transportation Manager Steve Yates tried his best to point this out in 2004. He wrote letters to then-Mayor Shirley Franklin, alerting her to the fact plans to build an additional then 14 international gates were grossly misguided. The mayor’s office responded with a promise to investigate. What Yates didn’t know, was that the mayor was “in” on the boondoggle. Two years later, WSB reported there was never an investigation, and Steve Yates got fired for, according to his attorney, telling the truth.
Why should you care? Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport is like Lake Lanier. In good times, (normal rainfall) the lake is the horn of plenty. We use it for everything from leisure, watering our lawns to providing our drinking water. In bad times (drought) we realize how fragile and valuable that resource actually is … The airport? In good times, it’s a horn of plenty; the generator of unimaginable commerce and wealth. In bad times, (tough economy) it becomes painfully obvious how Atlanta city leaders abuse this precious resource.
Atlanta is the domestic airline connection capital of the U.S. In fact, more than 90 percent of the airport’s traffic is domestic. So why did Atlanta build a $1.6 billion international palace? According to experts like Steve Yates, it was because “Atlanta had (your) money to spend, and Delta didn’t want more domestic competition, so Delta allowed Atlanta to build something that wouldn’t threaten its domestic business.”
What does that mean to you? Your Aunt Millie from Kansas City is going to pay a lot more for a round-trip ticket to Atlanta, simply because the new international terminal precludes the airport from creating more domestic gates, and therefore, domestic competition. YOU will pay more to fly out of Atlanta for the same reason.
Atlanta’s terminal, at $125 million per gate, came in nearly 30 percent higher than New York LaGuardia’s new terminal, at $94 million per gate. Think about that. In the meantime, former Mayor Franklin and current Mayor Reed collected hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from the builders and vendors who benefited from airport construction.
The tragedy is, most of Atlanta’s media outlets chose to skip the Common Cause press conference which made this waste abundantly clear. Why? Because across town, the emperor had a new suit of clothes, and he wanted to show them (the new terminal) off.
For great consumer advice and companies you can trust, visit TrustDale.com. Watch Dale on TrustDale TV, weekends on WXIA 11 Alive, and don’t miss his consumer problem-solving radio show, Saturday afternoons on WSB AM and now 95.5 FM.