Petruzielo found charter school has accountability ‘deficiencies’
by Kyle Dominy
kdominy@cherokeetribune.com
June 22, 2011 12:00 AM | 4668 views | 8 8 comments | 15 15 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Cherokee County School Superintendent Frank Petruzielo has released his staff’s analysis of the Cherokee Charter Academy’s revised charter petition, which he said contains some of the same “deficiencies” that led to previous denials by the board.

The analysis was released at the Thursday meeting of the Cherokee County Board of Education. The school board is scheduled to vote on Cherokee Charter Academy’s petition at a special called meeting Friday at 6 p.m. at Cherokee High School in Canton.

Cherokee Charter is seeking the local school board’s approval after a May decision of the Georgia Supreme Court struck down the 2008 state law that allowed for its charter. The charter school won the approval of the Georgia Charter School Commission in 2010 after several denials from the Cherokee board since 2008.

One of the major concerns described in the analysis is the accountability of the school’s governing body and corporate structure with its management company, Charter School USA, a Florida-based for-profit company.

The analysis argues that the Georgia Charter Education Foundation Board, a nonprofit organized to oversee the school, was appointed by CSUSA. The analysis says the charter school’s local governing council, a board to oversee day-to-day operations of the school, was appointed by the Georgia Charter Education Foundation and CSUSA.

The analysis states that the “petition calls for these two boards to be appointed by themselves” without any input from Cherokee County taxpayers or parents with students enrolled in the school. Cherokee County School District staff believes taxpayers and/or parents should have input.

Lyn Carden, a member of the Georgia Charter Education Foundation board, declined to comment on the issue. However, Richard Page, the vice president of development for Charter Schools USA said his group had no say in the appointments or actions of the foundation.

“We don’t have any say in their actions,” Page said. “The Georgia Charter Education Foundation is its own legal entity. Once they are established, they will govern themselves. They hold us accountable through a contract.”

The fee of that contract is another concerned raised in the analysis.

In the first year budget submitted by Cherokee Charter Academy in its revised petition to the school system, the school has about $343,000 earmarked in management fees for CSUSA.

The analysis raises concern over a “sweep agreement” calling for any charter school budget surplus to be granted to the management company.

Page said there is no sweep agreement between CSUSA and Cherokee Charter Academy.

“A sweep agreement implies that whatever is left in the bank account at the end of the year belongs to the management company,” he said. “That is not the case.”

However, Page said, the management contract does allow for the management fee to be lowered or raised by vote of the Georgia Charter Education Foundation board — also listed as a concern in the superintendent’s staff analysis.

Budgetary oversight by the Board of Education is another topic of the analysis.

The analysis argues that with funds coming from tax collections in Cherokee County, the schools’ budgets should have final approval by the countywide elected Board of Education.

Carden disagreed with that point.

“We’re happy to let them look at it, but that’s not the way a charter school is set up,” she said. “Budget approval comes from the local governing council and the Georgia Charter Education Foundation.”

The analysis also challenges how well charter schools under Charter Schools USA meet mandated adequate yearly progress.

AYP is a federal mandate of the No Child Left Behind.

According to the analysis, only 35 percent of Charter School USA schools met AYP in 2009, as compared to 92 percent of Cherokee County schools.

However, AYP standards are set by the state.

CSUSA had 23 schools in operation last year, all but one in Florida.

“AYP is set state by state,” Carden said. “Florida’s expectations are much higher than Georgia’s. It’s like comparing oranges to peaches.”

Page agreed and corrected the data saying 39 percent of CSUSA schools made AYP. He also noted that only 22 percent of Florida’s public school made the mandate in 2009.

“We are out-performing the traditional public schools when you compare apples to apples,” he said.

The charter school’s proposed facility also drew red flags.

Cherokee Charter is planning to occupy the former American Heritage Academy facility on Sixes Road in Canton.

American Heritage lost the building to foreclosure earlier this year. The building is being leased from its owner, Delaware-based Manufacturers and Trading Trust and Company.

Petruzielo has expressed concerns with public funds going to a privately owned building.

Also at last week’s meeting, Petruzielo released his required petition revisions for the Cherokee Charter Academy.

The document, he said, contained all the changes Cherokee Charter would have to make to their petition in order to receive a positive recommendation from him.

The revisions change Cherokee Charter’s charter petition to meet the superintendent’s concerns. One major change required by the superintendent is decreasing the proposed school’s student body.

Cherokee Charter Academy proposed an inaugural class of 995 students. The school’s revised petition says its maximum student body will be 1,145.

A new school with a student body of 500 would have a $3.4 million impact on the school system’s budget Petruzielo said.

At a Board of Education work session last week, Petruzielo said amount has been earmarked for the charter school in the school system’s tentative budget.

The school system is facing shrinking revenues due to state cuts in education funding and continual decreases in the county’s tax digest.

The Board of Education is scheduled to approve the school system’s next operation budget next month.

Having more students would cause “significant negative budgetary impact,” which could lead to teacher layoffs, furlough days or a tax increase, on the school system, Petruzielo said at the meeting.

Carden declined to comment on Petruzielo’s required changes.
Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
ga_momma
|
June 25, 2011
I found it strange that a charter school was proposed for Canton anyway. Cherokee county has some of the highest ranking schools in the entire state. Charter schools are a means of alternate education when the public school system is lacking is some way. That is far from the case in CC. According to online stats, Sixes Elem (which is only a few miles from where the Charter School wanted to operate) is ranked 714 out of 53599 in the entire COUNTRY! There is nothing lacking here. Let the charter school open up where they are needed more, perhaps Detroit would be a good place.
SoundBytesArentFacts
|
June 24, 2011
Until you immerse yourself in how educational success is measured from state to state and district to district thoroughly, you aren't really informed. The only so called measure in which FL outperforms GA is in the SAT. But there is a phenomenon that skews the data. The HOPE scholarship while wonderful in affording opportunities to go to college has had the unintended effect of lowering the average SAT score of its students. Not because the students are performing lower, but students who would never have considered taking the test before now gamble(smartly) that if they score well, they can attend a GA college, university, or tech school. Not to mention that CCSD vastly outperforms the state and national average in every measure. Unfortunately, we have a greater than average number of loud and uninformed critics. If CCSD is a top performing district, why attack the foundation of the system with a questionable reform like CSUSA?

As far as Dr. P's salary goes, he has taken cuts in pay along with the rest of CCSD employees. If you want to use the private sector as a model for executive pay, his salary is quite modest considering the number of employees under his supervision and the gains in performance by every measure of the district, even in the face of shrinking budgets, massive growth, and continual changing of the rules (No Child Left Behind, immigration law, state mandated calendar changes, Race to the Top, etc.). A serious discussion about executive pay is reasonable, particularly when it is public dollars. But it can't be the tired big government is bad, privatization is good circle of logic, It has to be based on real data.
backer2
|
June 23, 2011
$200k for a school system super is not out of line, especially for the size of Cherokee. In fact, I would say that he is underpaid. Have you looked at APC, DeKalb, or Clayton counties lately? Have you seen the crap that is going on in Cobb with their school board? Have you seen the economic situation of the past 4 years and how that has effected schools all around the country?

Now, LOOK at Cherokee County schools. Decline in test scores? No, some of the highest in the state. 35 kids to a classroom? Not here. Massive teacher layoffs? Nope. Closing schools down or severe cutback in services? Nadda. Trouble with SACS, the hall monitor of school systems? Not a chance. Fighting among School Board members? Try another metro county.

Stability? Yes. High schools rated among the nations finest? Of course. Great opportunities for your children to learn in a good environment? Absolutely.

I would say each one of you needs to go to the meeting on Friday and personally thank EACH board member and Dr. P for the excellent public service that they have provided. I know I will. How about that for truth!!!
Rod Johnson
|
June 22, 2011
Dr. P works for bread sticks.

To the tune of about $200,000/year.

All of the "We don't want private company to profit from public school" arguments are bunk: Private citizen Dr. P is raking in HUGE profitable amounts of taxpayer cash to do little more than obfuscate progress and saddle up to buffet lines.

The man's a typical gov't worker: Useless.
Data?
|
June 22, 2011
I read a lot of claims by the charter school supporters. Where is the data? All reports I've seen show that charter schools on average perform similarly to public schools. Also charter schools are supposed to provide an innovative way of teaching or a program that is not provided by the local school system. Their website indicates they will be following the instructional practices of R. Marzano which is good, but nothing new to a high performing school system such as Cherokee County. Looking at their application, there is no indication of a new or innovative program. If they were providing a STEM program, or had a focus on gifted or special ed students that would be great. As it is they will be emulating what Cherokee County already does really well.
SpockIAmNot
|
June 22, 2011
C'mon Ed. Don't try to use logic here -- you'll confuse the teachers that are reading this article.
pfohl
|
June 22, 2011
I thought the Superintendent worked for the School Board. This is obviously not the case.
EdTruth
|
June 22, 2011
Let me see if we can get this argument straight:

1. Charter Schools USA produce public charter schools that outperform other public schools in Florida.

2. Florida outperforms Georgia as it relates to the quality of public school education.

3. If approved by the School Board, the Charter School will become a part of the Cherokee Public School system and will educate Cherokee Public School Students with the funds connected to the respective Cherokee Public School Student.

So, you have a proven record of success (CUSA schools outperforming other public schools) that will do the same job (educate our children) for the same cost. It's a no brainer!

If you want to continue to improve public school education in Cherokee County, then approve the Charter School's application. Anything less than these facts are merely putting up a smoke screen.

*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides