Barge’s endorsement of Chip Rogers raises questions
by Dick Yarbrough
columnist
August 08, 2012 12:42 AM | 2837 views | 7 7 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Dick Yarbrough
Dick Yarbrough
slideshow
What in the world was State School Superintendent John Barge thinking when he endorsed the re-election campaign of State Sen. Majority Leader Chip Rogers (R-Woodstock)? Chip Rogers, in case you are not aware, is not exactly public education’s best friend.

Rogers talks about education “being in his blood” and then proceeds to bleed public schools by promoting a variety of schemes, including school vouchers, virtual schools and pushing the state to take control of the process for creating charter schools (and the campaign contributions of for-profit charter school management companies that comes with that) away from local school systems.

Why would State School Supt. John Barge endorse a guy whose mission seems to be to lead a crusade to destroy the very institution that Dr. Barge represents?

My sources tell me that it was out of loyalty to Rogers for having endorsed Barge when he announced his candidacy for school superintendent. If true, that is commendable because loyalty is in short supply in the blood sport of politics.

Of course, Chip Rogers, being the standup guy he is, immediately announced that John Barge also supported the senator’s “market-based reform” approach to public education. In other words, Rogers claims that the superintendent endorses his controversial voucher program. That, the superintendent says, is not correct.

In a letter to angry school superintendents just after the endorsement was made known on Rogers’ website, Barge said in part:

“Please allow me to set the record straight.

“Chip (Rogers) was one of the first Republican elected officials to endorse my candidacy for Superintendent. We agree on many conservative issues. One issue we disagree on is vouchers for education. Unfortunately, it appears that his website erroneously reported that I support “market-based reform,” which sounds like a more palatable way of saying vouchers. This was an unintentional error that he will correct very shortly. I have very clearly stated my opposition to Senator Rogers regarding vouchers.

“Reasonable people can disagree on important issues and still see the importance of working together for the greater good. And while I know the cuts to public education over the past several years are crippling to many of you, I maintain hope that, should the Senate Majority Leader win his bid for re-election, we can work together to begin to restore some funding to your struggling systems.

“Our students, educators, and all who are involved in our public education system can rest assured that they have a tireless champion and advocate as their State Superintendent of Schools. I will continue, as I always have, to oppose any and all voucher programs that I believe undermine the strength of our public education system.

I will take Dr. John Barge at his word, except I don’t think what Rogers did was “unintentional.” I think it was deliberate and typical of a man well-known to stretch the truth to suit his own purposes. That Rogers would use Barge’s endorsement to claim that the superintendent also supported his “market-based reform” malarkey should tell the superintendent loud and clear who and what he is dealing with.

In an earlier interview, the superintendent said he had told Sen. Rogers he was opposed to vouchers until and unless the same accountability was placed on private schools as on public schools. “If you won’t hold private schools accountable to the same extent as public schools,” he said to Rogers, “then give public schools the same leeway private schools have.” Now that he is safely re-elected, knock me over with a feather if Rogers and his pals in the Legislature have any intention of holding private schools accountable to the extent they do public schools. When the Legislature requires private schools to furlough teachers and provides public schools with tax-deductible scholarship money, I promise that you will be the first to know.

The ball is now in Dr. John Barge’s court. How strongly will he oppose Rogers’ voucher scheme? What kind of stand will he take on the charter school amendment this fall? How hard will he fight to restore funding to our local school systems? How willing is he to take on incessant legislative meddling? Is he really the tireless champion and advocate for our public schools that he says he is?

As public school teachers begin another school term this week, they know who their enemies are. What they are looking for now is to see if Georgia State School Superintendent John Barge is really their friend. Stay tuned.

You can reach Dick Yarbrough at yarb2400@

bellsouth.net or P.O. Box 725373, Atlanta, Georgia 31139.
Comments
(7)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Kelly A
|
August 10, 2012
Choice because? Please note that the majority of the children who attend the Charter School do not live in the immediate vicinity.

Perhaps these children who attend Charter may not have done as well had they been attending the schools their zip code assigns them to.

Jbrami, why such hate against the Charter School. The Charter School does have differences that the traditional public school you are referring to. Please remember that a Charter School is a Public School.

JbramlAdd
|
August 10, 2012
What hate. Do you think that anyone who has the temerity to critize CCA has to "hate" the school. I don't hate the idea of charter schools when there is a need. I think CCA is a replication of services offered in CCSD, therefore an enormous waste of taxpayer dollars. The waste of my taxpayer dollars is what I hate. To add to it I hate even worse that those taxpayer dollars are being thrown down the bottomless pit of a for profit charter school company.
Choice because?
|
August 09, 2012
It is interesting to note that the CRCT scores of the elementary schools and middle school in the immediate vicintiy of the Cherokee Charter School exceed the Cherokee Charter School scores in almost every subject by grade.
On The Other Hand
|
August 08, 2012
As charter school teachers & parents began another school term last week, it's crystal-clear who their enemies are, starting with county superintendent and taxpayer servant Dr. P. and his head sycophant, Mike Chapman.

Other enemies of school choice and the education of all charter-school'd children are public school teachers and PTA members. These people despise anyone who dares to think for themselves and who have already discovered that the superintendent and his minions are wearing no clothes.

Jbraml
|
August 09, 2012
Add another group to your list. A majority of taxpayers who do not like paying for your little private school academy. You offer nothing that is any different from the public schools.

On the Other Hand
|
August 11, 2012
the public schools are mediocre but don't hold teachers accountable. the charter school fires mediocre teachers.

but folks like you love mediocrity and are threatened by success.
Dean Sheridan
|
August 08, 2012
@Dick Yarbrough When I read columnists well written articles "tickle" the dragon on issues like this, during a time when the paint is not even dry; it reaffirms our suspicions as Conservatives how slanted, bias and truly ideologically different we are. Let's just call a spade a spade here. One of the biggest issues on the campaign trail and questioned repeatedly by the media and those opposed to school choice was "When elected with all the bad blood how are you going to coalesce and solve the problems once the dust has settled?" You obviously have no genuine interest in that question here. The best interest of the next generation should come first; but that just hasn't occurred to you. Neither did that both men are politicians and their walking a thin line. Mr. Barge is no fool - as such some of the results using "bold ideas" from the other side are actually working and cannot be denied. I respectfully suggest you and others like you find ways to be part of the solution and not the problem. Our children and grandchildren are counting on the adults to step up to the plate for them, now, before it's too late. We can't afford another strike out.
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides