Early polls show most voters, being far too easily and routinely deceived, might favor what little the ballot will say on the matter — apparently many believe “charter” to be shorthand for “freedom of choice” instead of, as in this instance, meaning the freedom to spend your tax money to pay for somebody else’s choices.
This newspaper continues to support true charters that are paid for and governed and directed and supervised and supported by the local voters and their elected officials. Also it especially supports magnet schools, which are far more needed and focused and could be created by the charter method. Not only that but the entire Floyd County system — every single school — is already officially designated as of charter status in the sense that teachers, parents and community members have a hands-on role in direction and decision making.
Thus, it is with appreciation for true guts that all should applaud the position taken by John Barge, the state school superintendent who resides in Floyd County. In open defiance of his own Republican Party, that seems to prize blind obedience above intelligence, he came out against this amendment — and swinging.
This is no small example of political bravery. This amendment was floated by GOP Gov. Nathan Deal (after the Georgia Supreme Court had struck down as unconstitutional an earlier attempt by the state to take over local public education). That all GOP members of the local delegation actually voted for this atrocity would be reason enough to vote them out of office — except nobody is running against them. Citizens beware: You get what you allow to happen.
Barge, who should get a “profile in courage” award, did not hold his fire, saying: “I cannot support the creation of a new and costly state bureaucracy that takes away local control of schools and unnecessarily duplicates the good work already being done by local districts, the Georgia Department of Education and the state Board of Education. This constitutional amendment would direct taxpayer dollars into the pockets of out-of-state, for-profit charter-school companies whose schools perform no better than traditional public schools and locally approved charter schools.
“Until all of our public-school students are in school for a full 180-day school year, until essential services like student transportation and student support can return to effective levels, and until teachers regain jobs with full pay for a full school year, we should not redirect one more dollar away from Georgia’s local school districts — much less an additional $430 million in state funds, which is what it would cost to add seven new state charter schools per year over the next five years.”
The danger in this being on the ballot is that it doesn’t at all look like what the public would get. What appears on the surface is like asking voters “Do you think children should be able to read and write?”
It doesn’t explain that such charters could set their own admission requirements, which some fear would mean denying entry to the poor, minorities and special-needs children who some, sadly, believe “drag down” the opportunities offered their own little geniuses.
It does not reveal that the legislature has already set it up for any such state-blessed charters to receive more than twice as much in taxes as “ordinary” children in local public schools get from the state ... and takes those extra sums away from them. By the way, parents who already ante up tuition to send their children to this community’s several excellent private schools have particularly good reason to be infuriated.
Not only that but that could just be the start of the money diversion as, in HB 797, there is this interesting clause:
“Actively seek, with the assistance of the department, supplemental revenue from federal grant funds, institutional grant funds, and philanthropic organizations. The commission may receive and expend gifts, grants, and donations of any kind from any public or private entity to carry out the purposes of this article.” (The italics are ours.)
Also, among the many booby traps in plain sight on something few voters will ever read (the actual legislation) it says the state can define attendance zones — including of up to “statewide” size.
The state already has such as the School for the Deaf in Cave Spring. Perhaps that envisions special boarding schools for future violin virtuosos or Nobel Prize winners — with the taxpayers anteing up for room and board, probably in Atlanta, as well as education.
Or, this could allow a “statewide” boarding school, say at Sea Island, with admission requirements limited to the children of legislators and Georgia government employees making more than $100,000.
This thing is ugly, ugly, ugly and downright un-American. Barge is a hero for standing up against it and every voter in this state, including supporters of what charter schools are really supposed to be, should join him in not only voting “No!” on this come Nov. 6 but in crushing it so viciously that nothing of like evil would dare be attempted ever again.










Let me go ahead and address what's going to be said: You are right, the charter school in our county was not approved locally by our school board despite parental support. This was overwhelmingly due to financial concerns. I believe that when we look at their budget for this school year and see that the school will pay almost $900,000 to a Florida management company for 'administrative fees' on a school of less than 1,000 students, the CCSD School Board deserves a medal for turning it down. Our governor, who approved the charter, deserves to be tarred and feathered for allowing this much money (almost $900 per student) to flow out of the state to a Florida company when our school systems are struggling. (to compare: administrative costs for CCSD students are roughly $200 per student.)
Elementary math: $10,000 per-child is greater than the roughly $5,000 per-child the charter school is costing.
And $10,000 is much > than the $0 each charter school child is taking from the half-Billion-$$ local CCSD budget. The passage of 1162 wouldn't change that either. Since the local BOE will always & forever deny any real competitive choice, any such school approved by the state commission wouldn't take a dime from CCSD.
With the exception of parental volunteers, everyone involved in every aspect of every educational system --public or private-- turns a profit. If a CCSD teacher spends their salary on a trip to Disney World, are they "flowing the money out of state to FLA" too?
1162 is a good thing because it allows parents to bypass short-sighted BOEs that still cling to an educational model that thousands of parents already find insufficient for the 21st century and that has GA in the bottom of our nation's academic rankings.