Kudos to state Superintendent of Schools Dr. John Barge for his recent stance on the charter school amendment.
As he correctly points out, House Resolution 1162 is just an attempt to create a dual school district — another layer of bureaucracy that is not needed in Georgia government.
Presently, if a local school board votes down a charter proposal, the state Board of Education can reverse that decision. There is already a mechanism and system in place to take care of the appeal process.
This is how Cherokee Charter Academy was approved and can be renewed for years to come. There is no need to recreate the Charter Commission.
Amendment proponents want to do so because there likely is a better chance for charters run by for-profit entities to be approved by the Charter Commission than the State BOE.
Amendment proponents like to point out that no local funding will be used if the Charter Commission is re-established.
The problem is that state funding will be used in an environment where existing public school systems like the Cherokee County School District are being shorted millions of dollars through “austerity” reductions.
Until the state legislature fully funds existing schools, why would anyone support adding more “special” charter schools?
What is truly galling is that the state is presently funding these “special” charter schools at two and one-half times the per pupil rate which traditional public school districts are funded.
Anyone who supports Cherokee County’s public schools should vote “no” on the amendment in November.
Jennifer Hall
Woodstock










The training that took place in Orlando was not funded by the Tax Payers.
A month after opening CCA something AMAZING happened! --- A new choice plan was proposed by the Cherokee Co. School Board!!! More educational choices for the children of Cherokee county! CCA brought great things to an already GREAT school district-WITHOUT COMPROMISING IT!
Drop out rate is not 25% and you know what? some kids go to jail, get pregnant, try drugs and are on welfare while they are IN school...so they take longer than 4 years to graduate.
When looking at the cost to educate students you have to compare apples to apples, look at CCSD Operating budget, not total budget. CCA doesnt have busing, nurses, special ed which are all expensive.
THIS IS NOT ABOUT WHO OR WHAT IS A BETTER WAY TO EDUCATE CHILDREN...IT IS ABOUT MAKING GOVERNMENT BIGGER AND WITH MORE POWER! not about parent control!!
IT COST'S $2,000-$3,000 LESS TO EDUCATE A CHARTER STUDENT!!!! 90% of Charter High School students graduate.
Obviously Charter School are a Taxpayer's friend. They cost less, give more and gives real local control-PARENT CONTROL!
Easy now, child...you'd be amazed at some of the money spent in the public education realm on "educational trips" for teachers. Oh yes, we have our national conventions in Vegas, many beautiful places in Florida, etc...all on the taxpayer's dime. Certainly nothing wrong with having an "educational professional development" course in such a place, now is there? It makes us better teachers, right? Point being, sweetie -- you don't EVEN want to open up that little box & see what pops out. You'd be unpleasantly stunned -- and that's just the money ol' Dr. P. and the CCSD will fess up to.
"This is how Cherokee Charter Academy was approved and can be renewed for years to come. There is no need to recreate the Charter Commission."
This was overturned by the supreme court in ga.
"Amendment proponents want to do so because there likely is a better chance for charters run by for-profit entities to be approved by the Charter Commission than the State BOE"
Every public school is for profit, it they were not nobody would work there.
"What is truly galling is that the state is presently funding these “special” charter schools at two and one-half times the per pupil rate which traditional public school districts are funded."
This is factually incorrect, they are funded at 65% less then the other schools.
In addition the money they get at this moment is from STEM grants, which can not go to traditional schools.
why is it that Charter Schools can educate their children for 3000.00 a year less per child than traditional public schools....? Because charter schools can hand pick their students AND they can (and have) turn(ed) away students with special needs. If the public schools could do the same thing, then it would cost less per student to educate.
Americans are rejecting the traditional public schooling model for a variety of reasons but mostly because it's been a complete failure for America, as evidenced by our nation's slide down global rankings. It's why only 5% of America finds traditional public schools to be an 'excellent' source of education. 95% of Americans think otherwise. Locally, why support an increase of funding to a GA school system mired at the bottom of numerous national rankings? Why not support an alternative to this continued below-average performance even as per-child spending has doubled the past 2 decades?
How exactly will more money fix the problems it hasn't fixed already? Repeating the same thing and expecting different results isn't good policy - it's insanity.
Passage of 1162 ensures that Georgian taxpayers will continue to have the alternative that charters provide.
Voting NO to 1162 ensures that the poor and minorities stay mired in their current, poor educational systems, like the corrupt joke that is the Atlanta Public School system.
Make no mistake: BOEs around the state will simply begin denying approvals and renewals of existing charter schools if 1162 is defeated. BOEs are more interested in funding than education of our children, as evidenced by the numerous complaints by various superintendents for more funding even as we trudge through this Recession.
I know the next argument is the property tax. If your property tax is $800 a year towards education, there is no reason why taxpayers should pay the other thousands of dollars just because you want to segregate your child.
Last, if we say "the dollars follow the backpack" then we need to extend this to people who pay a BIG chunk of their change to public schools who have no children at all. Maybe they should put a back pack on and keep the money.
FREE schools work because everyone puts in their share for everyone, not just those that have children in school. You have no right to demand that we pay for your special privileges.
This is not about choice...this is about a "gimme mine" attitude.
So what your saying in the benighted way that you are, is that no public money should go to any private for profit business?
Interesting, so tell me how do you expect the cafeteria to operate? The computers to be maintained? How in the world would they even have the ability to get to the internet? Why they would have to pay a for profit company for that too.
The argument is weak as it is false.