Obama making Bush look like a model of restraint
May 15, 2013 11:50 PM | 1223 views | 2 2 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
To a person, probably, most of Barack Obama’s supporters believed — a belief the candidate encouraged — that, if elected, he would rein in “the worst excesses” of President George W. Bush’s national-security strategy (a strategy that actually did an excellent job of keeping us safe in the years after 9/11).

But the opposite has happened.

President Obama has embraced targeted drone assassinations. Bush operatives used waterboarding and other “enhanced interrogation techniques” that some — mostly on the left — consider indistinguishable from torture.

Bush fought the eternal White House battle against leaks, but the Valerie Plame leak investigation that led to a single conviction — and that for an offense unrelated to the leak itself — now looks like a door-slamming French farce compared to the Obama administration’s latest stunt.

On Friday, the Associated Press, the U.S.’s largest news-gathering organization, and judging by its coverage, one that could hardly be considered as friendly to conservatives — found out that Obama’s Justice Department had secretly seized two months of its phone records.

The subpoena targeted the cell, office and home phones of six reporters and an editor. In all, at least 20 separate phone lines were monitored in April and May 2012, including the wire service’s New York headquarters, Washington bureau, Hartford, Conn., office and the main number for AP offices in the House press gallery. Potentially, the calls of more than 100 journalists were monitored.

To call this overly broad is to make an understatement.

The Justice Department has strict guidelines for wiretapping members of the press: The investigation must involve a serious crime; the information being sought is vital to the prosecution of the case; the information can be obtained no other way; and the attorney general must give his personal approval, often in writing.

Bush’s Justice Department, despite its alleged ethical lapses, adhered to the guidelines. Obama Attorney General Eric Holder says he played “no direct role” in the AP case. If he played any role at all in the episode, he should resign or be fired by his pal, the president. But don’t hold your breath waiting for either to happen.

Ostensibly, the investigation is to find out who leaked the details of a failed al-Qaida plot to bomb a U.S.-bound airliner last year. But the stated reason in an administration leak investigation is rarely the real reason.

It’s not aimed at the journalists for whom a subpoena is a badge of honor. Instead, it is meant to terrify into silence government employees who might deal with a reporter. The Obama administration relentlessly pursued current and former employees suspected of leaking secret material and prosecuted more of them than all previous administrations combined. (For further examples of this, see how it treated the Benghazi whistleblowers.)

Either Obama knew his administration was bugging the country’s most important news organization; knew that his Internal Revenue Service, at the direction of higher levels than previously disclosed, targeted conservative groups; and that the Benghazi diplomatic facility was dangerously vulnerable — or he didn’t. And the smart money as this is written is on the likelihood that he did.

Maybe exculpatory explanation is still to come. Until then, one way or another, the president is disastrously inept or dangerously misinformed.
Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
crema
|
May 18, 2013
Bush started an entire decade long war killing thousands on the hunch of weapons of mass distruction - check mate to Bush.
thunda
|
May 24, 2013
Crema-at least Bush didn't kill his own citizens. From voting for infanticide to the drone that killed three US citizens to all the current MAJOR issues facing Obama's administration. Bush was called "un-patriotic" by Obama for his accumulated debt over 8 yrs and he accumulated nearly twice as much as Bush in 4 yrs. There is absolutely NO comparison b/w Bush and Obama. Did Bush make some wrong decisions over the war...probably. But Obama has done nothing but make bad decisions since the day he was sworn in! Obama doesn't believe GITMO should be allowed and waterboarding is cruel but yet he is ok with droning and killing american citizens who could pose a threat? Enough said
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides