Legal tussle erupts over bones of Richard III
by Jill Lawless, Associated Press
August 16, 2013 10:45 AM | 725 views | 0 0 comments | 13 13 recommendations | email to a friend | print
This is an undated file photo released by the University of Leicester, England, of remains found underneath a car park in September 2012 in Leicester, which have been declared "beyond reasonable doubt" to be the long lost remains of England's King Richard III, missing for 500 years. A British High Court judge on Friday Aug. 16 2013 granted a group of Richard's relatives the right to challenge plans to rebury the 15th-century monarch in the city of Leicester. Judge Charles Haddon-Cave said the Plantagenet Alliance could take action against the government and the University of Leicester. A hearing is due later this year. The government has given Leicester Cathedral a license to rebury the king, but the relatives’ group wants him buried in the northern England city of York, claiming it was the king's wish. Richard was killed in battle in 1485. His skeleton was found last year under a Leicester parking lot. (AP Photo / University of Leicester, file)
This is an undated file photo released by the University of Leicester, England, of remains found underneath a car park in September 2012 in Leicester, which have been declared "beyond reasonable doubt" to be the long lost remains of England's King Richard III, missing for 500 years. A British High Court judge on Friday Aug. 16 2013 granted a group of Richard's relatives the right to challenge plans to rebury the 15th-century monarch in the city of Leicester. Judge Charles Haddon-Cave said the Plantagenet Alliance could take action against the government and the University of Leicester. A hearing is due later this year. The government has given Leicester Cathedral a license to rebury the king, but the relatives’ group wants him buried in the northern England city of York, claiming it was the king's wish. Richard was killed in battle in 1485. His skeleton was found last year under a Leicester parking lot. (AP Photo / University of Leicester, file)
slideshow
In this file photo dated April 2, 2013 shows a of a view of the skeleton of England's King Richard III . A British High Court judge on Friday Aug. 16, 2013 granted a group of Richard's relatives the right to challenge plans to rebury the 15th-century monarch in the city of Leicester, where his remains were found last year. Judge Charles Haddon-Cave said the Plantagenet Alliance could take action against the government and the University of Leicester. A hearing is due later this year. The government has given Leicester Cathedral a license to rebury the king, but the relatives’ group wants him buried in the northern England city of York, claiming it was the king's wish. Richard was killed in battle in 1485. His skeleton was found last year under a Leicester parking lot.(AP Photo/Rui Vieira/PA, File)
In this file photo dated April 2, 2013 shows a of a view of the skeleton of England's King Richard III . A British High Court judge on Friday Aug. 16, 2013 granted a group of Richard's relatives the right to challenge plans to rebury the 15th-century monarch in the city of Leicester, where his remains were found last year. Judge Charles Haddon-Cave said the Plantagenet Alliance could take action against the government and the University of Leicester. A hearing is due later this year. The government has given Leicester Cathedral a license to rebury the king, but the relatives’ group wants him buried in the northern England city of York, claiming it was the king's wish. Richard was killed in battle in 1485. His skeleton was found last year under a Leicester parking lot.(AP Photo/Rui Vieira/PA, File)
slideshow
LONDON (AP) — He's been deposed, reviled, buried and dug up, and now a new battle looms over England's King Richard III.

A British High Court judge on Friday granted a group of Richard's relatives permission to challenge plans to rebury the 15th-century monarch in the central England city of Leicester, where his remains were found last year.

Judge Charles Haddon-Cave said the Plantagenet Alliance could take action against the government and the University of Leicester, though he hoped the dispute could be settled out of court.

"In my view, it would be unseemly, undignified and unedifying to have a legal tussle over these royal remains," the judge said, urging the opposing sides "to avoid embarking on the (legal) Wars of the Roses Part 2."

Richard was deposed and killed in a battle near Leicester in 1485, and quickly buried without a coffin in a now-demolished church in the city, which is 100 miles (160 kilometers) north of London. A skeleton found under a Leicester parking lot last year was identified as the king through DNA tests, bone analysis and other scientific scrutiny.

The discovery thrilled history buffs — as well as Richard's supporters, who hope to rehabilitate the image of a king whose villainous reputation was cemented by William Shakespeare's "Richard III."

But it sparked a scuffle over where the last British monarch to die in battle should be reburied.

The government gave Leicester Cathedral a license to rebury the king, but the relatives' group wants him interred in the northern England city of York, claiming it was Richard's wish.

Richard belonged to the House of York, one of two branches of the Plantagenet dynasty involved in a 15th-century battle for the crown known as the Wars of the Roses.

Haddon-Cave said in his ruling that it was inevitable there would be "intense, widespread and legitimate public interest and concern in many quarters as to the treatment and final resting place of Richard III's remains."

He said the case "involves the remarkable, and unprecedented, discovery of remains of a king of England of considerable historical significance, who died fighting a battle which brought to an end a civil war which divided this country. The obvious duty to consult widely arises from this singular fact alone."

The judge said the Plantagenet Alliance could take its case to court, but hoped legal battle could be avoided by setting up an independent advisory panel to recommend the best burial site.

Neither the alliance nor the government had any immediate comment on the ruling.

The University of Leicester, whose scientists led the search for the king's remains, said it was "entirely proper and fitting that the remains of Richard III, Duke of Gloucester, be buried in the magnificent holy setting of Leicester Cathedral, near where his remains had lain for centuries."

It said some relatives of Richard had expressed support for a Leicester burial, including Michael Ibsen, the 17th great-grandnephew whose DNA was matched to the skeleton found under the parking lot.

Leicester is hoping for a tourism boost from its association with the king, and is building a 4 million-pound ($6.3 million) visitor center near the spot where his remains were found.

___

Jill Lawless can be reached at http://Twitter.com/JillLawless



Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
*We welcome your comments on the stories and issues of the day and seek to provide a forum for the community to voice opinions. All comments are subject to moderator approval before being made visible on the website but are not edited. The use of profanity, obscene and vulgar language, hate speech, and racial slurs is strictly prohibited. Advertisements, promotions, spam, and links to outside websites will also be rejected. Please read our terms of service for full guides